Mahmud, in general these ...

Published by

Mahmud, in general these ...

Mahmud, in general these ...

Mahmud, in general these approaches are very similar and as Sean explained below the subtle technological advances associated with the CPI approach provide marginally better results/economics although do have drawbacks around reliability.  Our approach at Clean Industrial has been deploying rapid oil water separation capabilities in mobile platform - using an integrated membrane system (IMS).  This system is comprised of an upfront liquid-liquid centrifuge and a ceramic membrane system that are controlled by an intelligent control system which enables a high level of efficiency / reliability of the robust UF ceramic membrane system.  This approach allows for instant separation and often is able to break emulsions that would otherwise remain in a gravity based system.  Our IMS approach gives you high quality effluent / filtrate, ability to deal with varying influent qualilties, rapid and reliable separation via a very small footprint.

1 Comment

Can you provide a comparison between the CAPEX and OPEX vs Conventional.  I mean you do have a lot of energy needed to run a centrifuge and then there is always potential membrane fouling.  I am assuming this is for an oil refinery.  This may help in the decision-making process. Just my thoughts as I was reading through your spec sheet. Don’t get me wrong I love the technology, but sometimes the economics are not there to run such a system. Can you aluminate those doubts for him? Thanks, Sean.

Published by

Permalink