Good suggestions have been ...

Published by

Good suggestions have been given by several experts. I would like to add the following:-

  1. Find what the microbiological growth consists of and in what way it is helpful or problematic.
  2. Chlorination solves some problems and creates others. Use of ozone or ultra-violet rays would be more advisable. These methods are needed mainly to eliminate pathogens.
  3. Microstraining can be very effective if the biological growth is due to algae, which can be harvested with advantage.

1 Comment

Hello Again it is necessary that these algae do not bathe in a liquid bio chemical at a high oxidation rate. This is the case for all collective sanitation effluents. The seaweed will saturate chemical pollution and die, as does the much more insensitive bacteria in a polluted environment. Sewage sludge contains more than 8% of dead bacteria. A heresy when we know that in nature a dead bacterium does not exist. But it is nice to see that people think that there is a super bacterium that survives without oxygen, in putrefying mud.

But why does this super bacteria not manage to muddy the mud?

Published by

Permalink