Hello. UV disinfection is ...

Published by

Hello. UV disinfection is used quite widely in Central Asia / former Soviet Union, especially for ground water which is generally (assumed?) to be high quality. Even basic systems seem quite effective (when bulbs are new and system is switched on an maintained!)  and due to remoteness of some villages, it is preferred to transport of chlorine products. Environmental concerns also discourage low quality powder which results in a lot or residue which is sometimes just cast aside. As others have said, the biggest issue is the lack of downstream protection. For new systems or those in good condition this is perhaps less of a consideration, but mostly the systems are old (often AC pipe or similar) and storage is not well maintained or monitored. For this reason we mostly discourage UV if chlorination is an option and only advise for fairly clean (particle free) ground water. 

1 Comment

I agree with you. The main UV advantages seems water taste, waste minimization and periodic transports of chemicals. At the other side we are considering reposition and energy costs and the main problem with residual effect.

Is possible that chlorine, or another disinfectant, must be injected to pipes to maintain a residual effect. The question should be if disinfection must be done continuously or a batch treatment is enough.

Any experience about?

Thanks

Published by

Permalink