That is the reason I am stating that we are fundamentally wrong. We are dealing with an issue that is as big as earth with such a localised approach. I can never ever negate all smaller efforts but our global focus need to be on sea water. Because most of global population live close to the sea.I also stated that there could be many chain reactions that will re establish many lost hydrological balances on terrestrial area . I am talking about 96.5 % water on earth but you talk about a much smaller scale. Not even 3.%. Is it not ? Once we get to the real focus (sea water) you can see things will positively change globally
Published by C V SUNDARA RAJAN
That is the reason I am stating that we are fundamentally wrong. We are dealing with an issue that is as big as earth with such a localised approach. I can never ever negate all smaller efforts but our global focus need to be on sea water. Because most of global population live close to the sea.I also stated that there could be many chain reactions that will re establish many lost hydrological balances on terrestrial area . I am talking about 96.5 % water on earth but you talk about a much smaller scale. Not even 3.%. Is it not ? Once we get to the real focus (sea water) you can see things will positively change globally