Once again you are using misdirection to hide the truth...and making assumptions about my faith to try and make yourself sound more credible. I am not an atheist, but I do deplore misdirection, deception and flat out false statements, which you are using to try and promote your technology. As far as your example of how "Non Toxic salt is" .... The ocean is only roughly 35 parts per thousand of salt or 3.5% by weight. The most extreme saline agriculture has only been successful on a trial basis with saline water below an EC of 10dS/m. And crop yields for cotton, mustard, millet and wheat drop to half once the dS/m reaches 8, which is only roughly 5% salinity. Once the fresh water is extracted using your technology, that percentage increases dramatically, even at only 11- 13%, no plant life can be sustained. And since the current saline agriculture is being done using ocean water or underground saline water....what's the point of using your technology...it simply becomes redundant. Since you propose to extract fresh water from ocean water with your technology, then you are INSTANTLY leaving behind far higher salt solution than can be used on any agriculture. To any thinking person, when fresh water is extracted from salt water, in any significant quantity, the SAR value of the solution left behind is TOXIC to plant and animal life. To deny that is an out right LIE! Even with conventional desalination, the discharge is only 50% salt, and it kills coral and marine life, even though it is dispersed into in the ocean and diluted, that would not be the case on land. This means it must be disposed of...and you are ignoring this fact! You continue to refuse to answer the pertinent questions about the output of your technology, and it's potential to supply the huge volumes required for agriculture. As I stated, it takes 785,000 m3 to irrigate a 1km dia field of wheat in 90 days and your technology can in no way do that effectively at any scale. There are only a small percentage of the salt tolerant Halophyte plant species that are edible, and they still cannot endure high concentrations much beyond the salinity of ocean water. So your misdirection that there are many opportunities to create saline agriculture with high concentrations of saline solution left over from your process is untrue! This leaves you with either irrigating conventional crops with a low salinity, (already available with current ocean water) which by the way builds up in the soils over time, rendering the soil non arable. This has always been the problem with irrigation with any saline water all over the world. You continue to refuse to answer direct questions about the output capacity of your technology to fulfill your claims. This either means you don't have the answers or are afraid to admit there are great exaggerations in your claims that you can turn desert coastlines into green agriculture with this technology, without any problem of disposal of toxic salt solution. Either way...you are being deceptive, and claiming the Lord is guiding you does not give you license to be untruthful or sidestep direct questions that would not in any way reveal the inner working of your technology. What I am asking you is no different than someone asking about the driving range and emissions output of a new car....it's not secret information and it is required if you want to interest anyone in your technology. However if you are making claims you cannot substantiate....then I can understand why you want to continue to try and divert attention by comparing your faith to mine and making broad statement about saline agriculture, which do not support your concept of how the Toxic saline solution will be disposed of, because it certainly isn't gonna be on crops of any kind. You can continue to post that you think I am confused and helpless...hahaha...but I'm the only one posting real scientific fact here. You are using misdirection to avoid answering direct questions that reveal you have great problems with your claims.
Published by Mervyn Byron
Once again you are using misdirection to hide the truth...and making assumptions about my faith to try and make yourself sound more credible.
I am not an atheist, but I do deplore misdirection, deception and flat out false statements, which you are using to try and promote your technology.
As far as your example of how "Non Toxic salt is" .... The ocean is only roughly 35 parts per thousand of salt or 3.5% by weight. The most extreme saline agriculture has only been successful on a trial basis with saline water below an EC of 10dS/m. And crop yields for cotton, mustard, millet and wheat drop to half once the dS/m reaches 8, which is only roughly 5% salinity.
Once the fresh water is extracted using your technology, that percentage increases dramatically, even at only 11- 13%, no plant life can be sustained.
And since the current saline agriculture is being done using ocean water or underground saline water....what's the point of using your technology...it simply becomes redundant.
Since you propose to extract fresh water from ocean water with your technology, then you are INSTANTLY leaving behind far higher salt solution than can be used on any agriculture.
To any thinking person, when fresh water is extracted from salt water, in any significant quantity, the SAR value of the solution left behind is TOXIC to plant and animal life. To deny that is an out right LIE!
Even with conventional desalination, the discharge is only 50% salt, and it kills coral and marine life, even though it is dispersed into in the ocean and diluted, that would not be the case on land.
This means it must be disposed of...and you are ignoring this fact!
You continue to refuse to answer the pertinent questions about the output of your technology, and it's potential to supply the huge volumes required for agriculture. As I stated, it takes 785,000 m3 to irrigate a 1km dia field of wheat in 90 days and your technology can in no way do that effectively at any scale.
There are only a small percentage of the salt tolerant Halophyte plant species that are edible, and they still cannot endure high concentrations much beyond the salinity of ocean water. So your misdirection that there are many opportunities to create saline agriculture with high concentrations of saline solution left over from your process is untrue!
This leaves you with either irrigating conventional crops with a low salinity, (already available with current ocean water) which by the way builds up in the soils over time, rendering the soil non arable. This has always been the problem with irrigation with any saline water all over the world.
You continue to refuse to answer direct questions about the output capacity of your technology to fulfill your claims. This either means you don't have the answers or are afraid to admit there are great exaggerations in your claims that you can turn desert coastlines into green agriculture with this technology, without any problem of disposal of toxic salt solution.
Either way...you are being deceptive, and claiming the Lord is guiding you does not give you license to be untruthful or sidestep direct questions that would not in any way reveal the inner working of your technology.
What I am asking you is no different than someone asking about the driving range and emissions output of a new car....it's not secret information and it is required if you want to interest anyone in your technology.
However if you are making claims you cannot substantiate....then I can understand why you want to continue to try and divert attention by comparing your faith to mine and making broad statement about saline agriculture, which do not support your concept of how the Toxic saline solution will be disposed of, because it certainly isn't gonna be on crops of any kind.
You can continue to post that you think I am confused and helpless...hahaha...but I'm the only one posting real scientific fact here. You are using misdirection to avoid answering direct questions that reveal you have great problems with your claims.